In response to Jennifer Roback Morse’s remarks to the Minnesota house I have asked them the following questions. I post a screen shot of them here since NOM and the Ruth Institute are generally not interested in open civil debate. I don’t expect them to provide any answers to them.
Gay and Lesbian people exist. We always have and always will. Regardless of what NOM, the Ruth Institute, or any of the other discriminatory organizations that continue to turn our own government against us hope to achieve. Sometimes I truly wonder what their goal really is. Is it to try and somehow cure us and eliminate us? I don’t think that there really is a clear answer to that question and frankly if that is the goal, it’s a fool’s goal because it can never be achieved. More Gay and Lesbian Americans are born everyday. Trying to rid America of us makes about as much sense as trying to get rid of everyone with red hair.
So if we aren’t going away what sort of protections do we deserve if not marriage? The reality of the mater is that we do fall in love. We do have children. We do build lives and families together. We buy homes together. We go on vacations together. We worry about paying the bills together just like any other family. Is it right that when one of us dies we have no say over burial or that we have to pay gift taxes on the things we bought together as a couple? If one of us becomes sick do we not have a right to visit our partner? Should we not have any rights to the children we may have spent years raising together simply because the state won’t allow us to adopt our partner’s biological child?
These are questions that can’t be answered by a simple contract other than that of civil marriage. Contracts other than marriage can be and often are challenged in court by family members that may not approve of the same sex relationship.
Without marriage are we just supposed to live a life without love, in solitude, and unhappiness? If you deny us marriage, then what will you allow?
World War II
I?ve been called a lot of names over the years and for the most part I tend to ignore them. Today however I was called a Nazi apologist because I was defending the right of someone, in particularly, Richard Iott, to dress up in an German war uniform and run around in a field with a bunch of other folks in German and American World War II uniforms reenacting events of the war. For as long as I can remember I have always been fascinated by World War II. I love reading about it, playing games based on it, and just generally learning every bit I can about the war, especially the Eastern European Theater. I spent many a night playing a World War II miniatures game called Command Decision with a group of folks in town. I never once felt like I was glossing over or even glorifying the horrors that the Nazi?s committed in the holocaust while I was doing it. I certainly can?t ignore those facts I really wouldn?t want to, but I enjoy learning about what it was like for solders on the front lines, and learning about the tactics of the battles, and I especially like taking battles where that were lost and seeing what it would take to turn them into victories and I don?t generally care if that means I?m playing as an American, a German, or some other combatant. It?s solely about learning about the war, one of the greatest turning points in human history.
And that is what reenactments are all about. Reenactments are about reliving moments in time, understanding what it was like to live the life of someone at a particular moment in history. There are hundreds of groups that do so around the country and the world and they cover almost every imaginable era of history, even if they tend to center around particular wars, like the Civil War, World War I, or World War II. Participating in one of these events doesn?t mean you want to gloss over the horrible things that happened or that you even want to ignore them. After the break are some videos from around the net from Reenactment groups.