Definition of Marriage

May 13th, 2009

For several days now, I?ve been in a running argument with an individual who goes by the name of ?On Lawn? over in the comments sections of the blog ran by anti-gay equality group National Organization for Marriage. In several comments here, here, and here, this person seems to imply that procreation, or at least the potential for procreation, is a requirement of marriage. I?ve tried several times to get this person to explain this concept but they keep brushing off the question calling it absurd. When I tried to point out that there is no link between marriage and procreation they came back with this.

Well, there shows the damage they want to do to the institution. If marriage can?t look equally at the interests of all involved in the practice of human mating, then you tell me what can.

Prehistoric humans didn?t marry before they mated, they just found a bush did it. When you look at the whole of human history, marriage is a relatively new creation, only being a few thousand years old. Our very existence proves that marriage is not a requirement or an essential element of the human mating process.


Read more

< |||| > 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Eric Cantor

Cantor Quake

imageHouse Majority leader Eric Cantor is getting some flack for this recent comments after Tuesday’s east coast earthquake.

There is an appropriate federal role in incidents like this.

Obviously, the problem is that people in Virginia don’t have earthquake insurance.

All of us know that the federal government is busy spending money it doesn’t have.

While suggesting that any disaster relief be offset with spending cuts elsewhere.

There are very few things that I agree with Cantor on, DADT, DOMA, ENDA, just to name a few; my gut instinct here is to agree with him. Now, Think Progress makes it seem in their commentary as if Cantor doesn’t want to provide any federal aid to folks in Virginia who suffered property damage from the quake, which isn’t what he said as you can see in the quote above, but even if he had I’d have a hard time not agreeing with that as well.

I truly don’t believe that our Federal government should come running with it’s credit card out every time there Mother Nature has a hissy fit. Now don’t get me wrong, I understand that there are times where it’s necessary for the Fed to lend a hand in a disaster. The impending hurricane Irene being a good example. Having the National Guard help fill sandbags and even provide them in a flood is another example of good government help. Rescuing people stuck in New Orleans during Katrina is another one.

But if your home gets flattened by twister and you were dumb enough not have insurance or know if your policy covered twisters then I’m sorry for your loss but the government has no business bailing you out. If your Virginia business takes a hit because of an earthquake and you didn’t have earthquake insurance, you’re on your own.

Now the flip side of that of course is that I would be ok if the government were to say provide you with a low or no interest loan to help you rebuild, but to expect a handout from Uncle Sam for every disaster is part of the crap thinking that landed us with national debt that would make the Great Wall of China look like a speed bump.

Categories