Homo-rality

February 20th, 2009

Contrary to what some may believe, being gay doesn?t sever a person from morality. I am not out to convert anyone, recruit anyone, and I am not preying on children, but I am supposedly?

?the greatest threat to America?

Everyone that tries to tell me that being a homosexual is wrong is relying on one thing, their religious beliefs. It seems to be nearly impossible to divorce any discussion about the rightness or wrongness of homosexuality from religion, because when you do, the people against it have nothing to base their argument on, and any good debater will tell you that you don?t win a debate by bringing God into it because it?s a cop out. God is all mighty, he can do anything, so any argument against that is moot. It comes down to biblical passages written by men who were ?under the influence of God? and ?can?t be wrong?. Can someone name me one living human being that isn?t ever wrong about something? How about naming one human being that isn?t living that was never been wrong about something, and yes I know that the first answer to that question is going to be Jesus Christ, but then in John 10:30 Jesus says?

I and my Father are one.

Does that mean that Jesus wasn?t human after all?


Read more

< |||| > 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Cantor Quake

imageHouse Majority leader Eric Cantor is getting some flack for this recent comments after Tuesday’s east coast earthquake.

There is an appropriate federal role in incidents like this.

Obviously, the problem is that people in Virginia don’t have earthquake insurance.

All of us know that the federal government is busy spending money it doesn’t have.

While suggesting that any disaster relief be offset with spending cuts elsewhere.

There are very few things that I agree with Cantor on, DADT, DOMA, ENDA, just to name a few; my gut instinct here is to agree with him. Now, Think Progress makes it seem in their commentary as if Cantor doesn’t want to provide any federal aid to folks in Virginia who suffered property damage from the quake, which isn’t what he said as you can see in the quote above, but even if he had I’d have a hard time not agreeing with that as well.

I truly don’t believe that our Federal government should come running with it’s credit card out every time there Mother Nature has a hissy fit. Now don’t get me wrong, I understand that there are times where it’s necessary for the Fed to lend a hand in a disaster. The impending hurricane Irene being a good example. Having the National Guard help fill sandbags and even provide them in a flood is another example of good government help. Rescuing people stuck in New Orleans during Katrina is another one.

But if your home gets flattened by twister and you were dumb enough not have insurance or know if your policy covered twisters then I’m sorry for your loss but the government has no business bailing you out. If your Virginia business takes a hit because of an earthquake and you didn’t have earthquake insurance, you’re on your own.

Now the flip side of that of course is that I would be ok if the government were to say provide you with a low or no interest loan to help you rebuild, but to expect a handout from Uncle Sam for every disaster is part of the crap thinking that landed us with national debt that would make the Great Wall of China look like a speed bump.

Categories