<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Micro-managing the Tax Payer Checkbook</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vastvariety.net/2009/05/20/micro-managing-the-tax-payer-checkbook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vastvariety.net/2009/05/20/micro-managing-the-tax-payer-checkbook/</link>
	<description>Political Ramblings and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 16:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vast</title>
		<link>http://vastvariety.net/2009/05/20/micro-managing-the-tax-payer-checkbook/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>Vast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 12:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foederati-wow.com/vast/?p=768#comment-120</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m more inclined to get upset over something that is spending our tax dollars. But I do think that if amendments are going to be added to a bill they should be amendments that are addressing the issue that is core to the bill. Adding a gun amendment to a credit card bill doesn&#039;t make sense.

As for the gun amendment itself, I&#039;m not totally against the idea of being able to carry a gun in some national parks, like Yosemite or Yellostone, but I don&#039;t think a person should be allowed to carry a gun on say Liberty Island.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m more inclined to get upset over something that is spending our tax dollars. But I do think that if amendments are going to be added to a bill they should be amendments that are addressing the issue that is core to the bill. Adding a gun amendment to a credit card bill doesn&#8217;t make sense.</p>
<p>As for the gun amendment itself, I&#8217;m not totally against the idea of being able to carry a gun in some national parks, like Yosemite or Yellostone, but I don&#8217;t think a person should be allowed to carry a gun on say Liberty Island.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annette</title>
		<link>http://vastvariety.net/2009/05/20/micro-managing-the-tax-payer-checkbook/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>Annette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 15:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foederati-wow.com/vast/?p=768#comment-119</guid>
		<description>Did you see what was slipped into the Credit Card bill this week? A bill to allow people to carry guns into National Parks...

That&#039;s what I am talking about... The President needs a line item veto...Or does your outrage only involve money?

See, I think it should apply equally to all things. There is no need for these things to tag onto to these bills like this. That should have been a separate bill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you see what was slipped into the Credit Card bill this week? A bill to allow people to carry guns into National Parks&#8230;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s what I am talking about&#8230; The President needs a line item veto&#8230;Or does your outrage only involve money?</p>
<p>See, I think it should apply equally to all things. There is no need for these things to tag onto to these bills like this. That should have been a separate bill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annette</title>
		<link>http://vastvariety.net/2009/05/20/micro-managing-the-tax-payer-checkbook/#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>Annette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 13:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foederati-wow.com/vast/?p=768#comment-118</guid>
		<description>This is where the line item veto would come in very nicely. The President could then take this out and not allow the extra money he didn&#039;t ask for and doesn&#039;t want.

Typical Congress putting in extra earmarks and pork for their districts and spending that is not needed. Just as they did in the Omnibus bill and tried to do in the Recovery Bill.

However it will end up being President Obama that catches the blame for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is where the line item veto would come in very nicely. The President could then take this out and not allow the extra money he didn&#8217;t ask for and doesn&#8217;t want.</p>
<p>Typical Congress putting in extra earmarks and pork for their districts and spending that is not needed. Just as they did in the Omnibus bill and tried to do in the Recovery Bill.</p>
<p>However it will end up being President Obama that catches the blame for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

