image002The President and congress have been working on getting an $85 Billion dollar war spending bill passed. On Thursday the House approved the bill but added almost $12 Billion dollars in spending above and beyond what Obama asked for.

I understand what the first 85 Billion is for. Increased numbers of troops in Afghanistan requires money for transportation, supplies, and infrastructure to maintain them. Money is also needed to continue operations in Iraq.

So what does this extra 12 Billion get us?

First of all, they added an extra $2.2 Billion in foreign aid, above and beyond that of what the president asked for. Why is congresses added more money to foreign aid than what the president wants? I don’t see any reason for it.

Second, $4 Billion of it goes to the purchase of military equipment, including the C-17 cargo planes that the Pentagon has stated it doesn’t need. Hello? If they don’t need them, why are we buying them?

This is the part that gets me. What gives congress the authority to tell the Pentagon that they have to buy these planes even if the Pentagon says they don’t need them? I understand that congress sets the budget, but shouldn’t it be the Pentagon that decides how the money is spent? I can even understand congress saying ok, here is this program for buying cargo planes, you have this much cash to do it with. Then if the Pentagon says they don’t need them or buys what they need, the left over money goes back to congress for other projects. It just doesn’t make sense that congress has the ability to say to the military, or any other government organization, that you have to buy this or that regardless of if you need it or not, that’s just wasteful. Why are we letting congress micromanage the checkbook?

Cross-posted on The Pajama Pundit

Related Posts with Thumbnails

View Comments to “Micro-managing the Tax Payer Checkbook”

  • Annette:

    This is where the line item veto would come in very nicely. The President could then take this out and not allow the extra money he didn’t ask for and doesn’t want.

    Typical Congress putting in extra earmarks and pork for their districts and spending that is not needed. Just as they did in the Omnibus bill and tried to do in the Recovery Bill.

    However it will end up being President Obama that catches the blame for it.

  • Annette:

    Did you see what was slipped into the Credit Card bill this week? A bill to allow people to carry guns into National Parks…

    That’s what I am talking about… The President needs a line item veto…Or does your outrage only involve money?

    See, I think it should apply equally to all things. There is no need for these things to tag onto to these bills like this. That should have been a separate bill.

  • Vast:

    I’m more inclined to get upset over something that is spending our tax dollars. But I do think that if amendments are going to be added to a bill they should be amendments that are addressing the issue that is core to the bill. Adding a gun amendment to a credit card bill doesn’t make sense.

    As for the gun amendment itself, I’m not totally against the idea of being able to carry a gun in some national parks, like Yosemite or Yellostone, but I don’t think a person should be allowed to carry a gun on say Liberty Island.

Leave a Reply

blog comments powered by Disqus
What I'm Doing...

Powered by Twitter Tools

Categories
Tag Cloud