The Political Playground

July 21st, 2010

On July 14th the NAACP passed a resolution condemning the racist elements with in the Tea Party movement. Needless to say that didn?t go over well with the Tea Party or the conservative movement in general.

Now, I’ll be honest, I haven?t read the text of the resolution, but I find it hard to believe that the NAACP was actually condemning the entire Tea Party Movement, and was instead just targeting the racist fringe elements, elements that tend to exist within all most any political movement. Elements that most Tea Party leaders themselves have been trying to remove.

So, on the 19th, Andrew Brietbart dug up some video clips from an NAACP awards dinner in March where Shirley Sherrod, USDA Georgia Director of Rural Development gave a speech, edited them to remove any context, and posted them on his site Big Government in an attempt to prove a point. Using editied video to undermine your political opponents has exploded thanks to the advent of the YouTube era.


Read more

< |||| > 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Archive for December 2008

Voice in the Wire

Late in the evening of December 6th, in the Exarcheia district of central Athens, 15 year old Alexandros Grigoropoulos was out with friends. Shortly after 9pm the group became part of a confrontation with members of the Greek Police. Alexandros was shot and killed.

In the days following the killing Alexandros became a symbol of a growing frustration among Greek youth over the country’s growing economic problems, rising unemployment, and a general perception of an inefficient and corrupt Greek government.

Riots in Athens over the death quickly spread like through out the country and then through out the whole of Europe.

The speed at which the riots spread has in part been attributed to organizers using text messaging and the internet as a means of spreading their message and setting up meeting locations. In an article to the Associated Press, Paul Have wrote…

At least some of the protests were organized over the Internet, showing how quickly the message of discontent can be spread, particularly among tech-savvy youth. One Web site Greek protesters used to update each other on the locations of clashes asserted there have been sympathy protests in nearly 20 countries.

This isn’t the first time we have seen the internet become a tool of the disenfranchised as a means of organizing protests.

When California passed Proposition 8 on November 4th, a wave of Anti-Prop 8 web sites such as Join the Impact, appeared on the web as a means of directing information to protesters and to organize events such as the Nationwide protest of November 15th and upcoming December 20th “Light Up The Night For Equality“.

Even in tightly controlled China, the internet has been used to organize people to effect change in government policies and stop construction of a chemical plant.

The internet is still basically in its infancy and the genie is out of the bottle. It’s difficult to imagine just how the civil rights movement of the 1960′s would have progressed had the internet been available. Imagine watching Martin Luther King’s “I have a dream” speech as a live web cast or if Rosa Parks could have texted all her friends to join her in sitting at the front of buses all over the country on the same day.

Often, as individuals, we feel somewhat powerless against those with power, whether it be government, or the vocal majority. We sit in our homes feeling sorry for ourselves and saying “I can’t do anything about my situation so I’ll just make the best of it.” What we don’t realize is that we are rarely if ever truly alone.

Cross posted at The Pajama Pundit

Iowa Supreme Court

A look Inside the Iowa Supreme Court and the Same-Sex Marriage Debate.
The video is about an hour and 45 mins in length and will start as soon as you click the link below.
Video from WHO TV

Read the rest of this entry »

Key to Equality: Iowa?

It’s often been said that the social norms of the country are born on the coasts where states like Massacusettes and California tend to be more libral. But while the country has recently had it’s attention out west where California narowly voted in Prop 8, stripping away the right for same-sex couples to marry, the real battle, the key to finially turning the nation, could be right here in Iowa.

Today the Iowa Suppreme Court hears oral arguments in the case Varnum v. Brien, in which 6 Iowa same-sex couples are sueing to have their marriages recognized and be issued marriage lisences. It was in late August when, for a very brief window of time, that Iowa had leagalized same-sex marriage when Judge Robert Hanson struck down the Defense of Marriage law of the state. It was that ruling that prompted a state constitutional amendment that failed to pass in the 2008 state legislature.

So here is how it breaks down.

If the Iowa State Suppreme court rules against the ban this month or even early 2009 then same-sex marriage will once again be legal. But that doesn’t mean that our fight for equality will be over. Far from it.

That constitutional amendment will go up to the state legislature again in 2009. If it passes then it must wait until the next legislative session in 2011 and must pass there before it can go to the ballot in the next general election.

That means that Iowa will have about 3 years worth of legalized same-sex marriage before the constitutional amendment can be voted on. How do think a constitutional ban will fair in the eyes of the people after 3 years?

I believe that most Iowans have open minds and hearts. I believe that most of just want to treated just like everyone else and I believe that equality will prevail.

Oral Arguments

Tomorrow at 10 am the Iowa State Supreme court begins hearing Oral Arguments on the status of same-sex marriage in Iowa. While Lamda Legal will argue that the couples constitutional rights have been violated Polk county will argue that the issue of same-sex marriage should be up to lawmakers and not the courts.

I counter Polk counties arguments with this.

1. There are currently no laws on the Iowa books prohibiting same-sex marriage. Same-sex couples are currently being denied marriage rights by county auditors that refuse to grant them licenses. The court then has every right to step in and make sure that county auditors are following the laws and both the state and federal constitutions as they are written.

2. Lawmakers have all ready attempted and failed at passing a constitutional amendment baring same-sex couples. It is in my opinion that they have then settled the issue and same-sex couples should be allowed to marry.

Happy Holidays

Happy holidays everyone.

I know that I have been pretty quiet lately, I’m an avid World of Warcraft player, and that, along with work has taken up a lot of time. I’ll be back to posting more regularly this week.

Categories